During the Mamluk-Kipchak period, the Mamluks' ascendancy in Egypt led to profound transformations in the medieval Islamic realm. Their dominion, spanning three centuries, saw them rise to sultans and exert significant influence over societal structures and legal principles by implementing the Islamic legal system. The primary objective of this scholarly investigation is to scrutinize the position of Sharia principles within the legal framework during the Mamluk-Kipchak period, alongside elucidating their societal function. The research also endeavors to elucidate the impact of the Hanafi madhhab on Sharia-related matters by concentrating on the legal dilemmas addressed in the text "Irshad al-Muluk wa-Salatīn". Furthermore, it aims to clarify how Sharia principles informed medieval legal structures and their relevance for modern Islamic legal studies. Various methodologies were employed, including normative-legal, empirical, comparative legal, theoretical, contextual, source-based, analytical, and selective techniques. The study involved an in-depth examination of the legal dimensions of the treatise "Irshad al-Muluk wa-Salatīn" and its role in the legal framework. The methodologies of Ijma' (consensus) and Qiyas (analogy) played pivotal roles in promulgating legal rulings, addressing public concerns, economic relations, and promoting social equity.