The article deals with the philosophy of power in the modern society of Kazakhstan. The main elements of power are subject, object and means. The subject of power can be an individual, body, organization, social association with an active, guiding origin, and these subjects must have the will to rule, authority, as well as be aware of the lifestyle of managers, be competent in their executive function, and be educated businessmen. The content of power relations is the formation of the general will by means of orders, decrees, combining the wills of individuals, influencing those who violate it by applying punitive measures, and forming rules in the general interest by normalizing behaviors. Power is always a two-way relationship, that is, it is a relationship between a subject and an object. Power cannot live without an object, that is, a people subject to power, naturally, in history, opposition of the object to the power of the subject is often encountered, that is, opposition to the rulers is expressed in the form of national liberation movements, uprisings, and armed conflicts. The quality of the object directly depends on the political culture of the population. As a result of the collapse of the Soviet Union, the presidential institution formed during the reconstruction of the former Soviet Union republics became the leading political system. This measure justified itself due to the instability of the political situation at that time, the need to complete many reforms in the social and economic sphere. The foundations of a new statehood were laid, and a single state authority capable of regulating and directing social development began to form. Mechanisms of joint action of branches of state power in achieving public agreement were formed at the constitutional level.
THE PHILOSOPHY OF POWER IN THE MODERN SOCIETY OF KAZAKHSTAN
Published April 2024
20
33
Abstract
Language
English
How to Cite
[1]
Suleimen Dinmuhammed 2024. THE PHILOSOPHY OF POWER IN THE MODERN SOCIETY OF KAZAKHSTAN. Bulletin of Abai KazNPU. Series of Historical and social-political sciences. 1, 80 (Apr. 2024). DOI:https://doi.org/10.51889/2959-6017.2024.80.1.035.